Damn it. Damn it. Damn it.
I hate ambiguity, I hate "grey" areas and I hate making hard decisions.
I was so happy, so comfortable and so settled with my treatment plan after meeting with the surgeon last week. I was ready. Lumpectomy, radiation, go.
I got a call from the doctor yesterday - my MRI and case went before the tumor review board. It was evaluated by multiple doctors. My scans are a hard to read. I have "busy" tissue and "a lot going on". Recommended to take more tissue than originally planned to make sure to get clear margins. Do I still want to do a lumpectomy? Are we still good?
I DON'T KNOW.
What do you recommend? What should I do? Why is mastectomy such a big scary word? Why am I terrified of the treatment plan that involves mastectomy????
Here's what I know:
The recurrence rate is BARELY different for a mastectomy and a lumpectomy (2% and 5% recurrence rates). This is what made me feel comfortable choosing lumpectomy and radiation for treatment. Chance of recurrence is low for either. So why wouldn't I opt to keep my boob?
I have now heard this, or something like this, a lot. I have "a lot going on" in my left breast. It's "busy". It's "hard to see". The ultra sound tech said it. The mammogram tech said it. BOTH radiologist who looked at my ultrasound and mammogram and did my biopsy said it.
So. Now this isn't just a question about recurrence. Now there's a question, totally unavailable for answers, about is there anything else going on in that left boob that I don't know about. And will I always worry if I don't just have it removed?
I DON'T KNOW.
I can do the lumpectomy and hope for good margins. If they aren't good, then I'd probably need to do a mastectomy anyway. If they are good, then I'll get MRI or Mammograms (probably alternating) every six months. But I hear this echo of "busy" and "hard to read".
Fuck cancer.